Skip to main content

Even a 'father' can 'stalk'

The Varnika Kundu case brought ‘Stalking’ back into the spotlight it belongs. The law should be used to book ‘stalking fathers’ too, writes Manu Shrivastava

Isn’t it a scary situation to be 'stalked'? However, will you even realise if someone stalks you in person or online? And, do you even know what stalking means, at least legally? Some of us may have paid a reasonable amount of attention to the term 'stalking', if not the act, particularly during the media coverage of Varnika Kundu case where the Chandigarh-based DJ was allegedly stalked.

While the Kundu case promised sufficient attention, ‘stalking’ had anyway been incorporated into the Indian Penal Code (IPC) through Section 354D in April 2013 after the infamous Nirbhaya Rape case of December 2012 that led to Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013. It will, however, take many more high profile cases and maybe more serious crimes for people and women, in particular, to understand the gravity of ‘stalking’ and how something seemingly innocuous can lead to more dangerous crimes such as molestation, rape and murder.


According to Section 354 D of the Indian Penal Code:
(1) Any man who—
follows a woman and contacts, or attempts to contact such woman to foster personal interaction repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such woman; or monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking;
(2) Whoever commits the offence of stalking shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine; and be punished on a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 defined ‘Stalking’ and broke the section into specific clauses; made the law gender-specific and the punishment more stringent. However, like most other laws, the challenges faced are the same - poor implementation, lack of awareness and hard-nosed mindsets of people and authorities as well. Little wonder then that the Kundu case made an offence as 'small' as ‘Stalking’ hit headlines.

Very often when a woman is being stalked she chooses to ignore the stalker and tries to evade the situation. In case of physical stalking, a woman may change her route or time of travel or commute and in case of online stalking, may block the perpetrator's profile or simply delete her own account. Cases and first person accounts reveal that running away or letting go of a stalker is never a solution.

In almost all such situations, an ‘ignored’ stalker returns with a higher sense of misplaced courage and may aggravate his/her attempts to get attention or get things done. Every activity of a stalker much be accounted for and a formal written complaint should be made in a police station. The police are also slowly accepting the seriousness of stalking and more and more cases are being registered under Section 354D of IPC.

One very important and equally ignored aspect of stalking is that the crime is often committed by ‘family members’ which, owing to patriarchal mindset, is simply not taken into consideration by even the authorities. What happens when a girl’s father, brother, uncle or her mother stalks her? Such cases are dismissed by the police, counsellors, even support groups as ‘family matters’ making it almost impossible for a woman to seek refuge except through extraneous judicial means. Most such women are abused by family, judged by society and dismissed by authority and all of this veiled from public outrage by a misplaced sense of ‘family dignity’ and ‘culture’.

The Indian Constitution grants every citizen The Right To Live With Dignity under the fundamental Right to Life. Any act committed by a man that violates a woman’s right to live with dignity qualifies as abuse and is punishable by law. When the victim resorts to becoming independent, the family often harasses and stalks her and with no action from the police the problems get compounded. This brings to fore the need to increase awareness about ‘stalking’ as a serious crime and in accepting the fact that anyone, even a family member, following or monitoring a woman and her activities, against her wishes, is a ‘stalker’ under Section 354D of the IPC.

There have been several cases in the past when the victim’s failure to report ‘stalking’ or the police’s refusal to register and take cognizance of an offence led to the murder or rape of the victim. The most notable case being of Priyadarshini Mattoo, a law student, who was raped and brutally murdered by her stalker. Although Priyadarshini had lodged complaints of harassment, intimidation and stalking against her stalker whose father was a senior IPS officer, she was liquidated. Unfortunately, fact remains, women themselves don’t take stalking seriously without realising the consequences.

Films have played a significant role in justifying stalking where the protagonist of a film stalks a girl and is shown as wooing her by doing so. Raanjhanaa, for instance, glorified and justified the entire act of stalking. The influence of films on the common man is a given. The Central Board of Film Certification and the film fraternity also, therefore, have a responsible role to play by not glamourising an act such.

In the case of Varnika Kundu, the facts of the case will be revealed gradually in due course of investigation but what it has successfully managed to do is bring ‘stalking’, an ‘innocuous’ act, in the purview of legal and social debates.

Popular posts from this blog

The MeToo movement that no one talks about

The #MeToo movement was welcome yet did not touch upon the most shocking acts of them all, #MeToo@home. Manu Shrivastava writes on the horrific trend that needs to be exposed The year 2018 will be remembered for many things – good, bad and ugly. But that one movement that took over the media and shook our collective sensibilities, was the #MeToo movement. Not only did it resonate with millions of working women from all walks of life, around the world, it brought to fore the extent of discrimination and harassment women face, when they chose to work. The movement definitely provided the much lacking support in incidents of molestation and sexual harassment, as thousands of women got the courage to speak up about their abuse, and many even publicly named their abusers. What started as a one-off revelation by a Hollywood actress abused by a multimillionaire producer, spread like a wildfire in Hollywood, USA, and around the world. Many women followed up with legal action, several ...

‘Locked-In’, At Risk At ‘Home’

"The lockdown has itself created psychological issues and violence within the family. Women have been burdened with more work; children have been unable to go to schools...One of the critical areas which has come to our notice was rising violence within the family itself," said Supreme Court judge Justice N V Ramana at a webinar conducted on June 4, 2020. The judge at the apex court was speaking during his keynote speech at the release of ' Handbook of Formats: Ensuring Effective Legal Services ’. As India entered Lockdown 5.0 or Unlock 1.0, as some call it, the event highlighted a critical trend during the lockdown -- an increase in cases of violence with the family, especially against women. Justice Ramana, also executive chairman of National Legal Services Authority, pointed out the effect the pandemic has had on the rights and safety of women in the country. It was a regular Tuesday evening. As everyone went about their usual chores at a crowded chawl in Mumba...

Gender and Justice

The Supreme Court of India has been very proactive when it comes to women and child welfare. The triple talaq and the reforms brought in after the Nirbhaya rape incident, are cases in point, says Manu Shrivastava The recent rape incidents in Kathua and Unnao in Jammu & Kashmir and Uttar Pradesh respectively, have once again brought the issue of women’s safety in India to the forefront. These incidents garnered global attention, albeit negative, of national and international media with some groups allegedly even donning T-shirts across the world warning women to not visit India. The Kathua rape and murder case, in particular, brought back memories of the Nirbhaya rape case and triggered widespread protests. That said, it must be noted that the Nirbhaya rape incident had led to the government bringing in swift legal reforms for victims of sexual violence and amendments in the law for crimes against women. The evolution of the judiciary Over the last 70-odd years, independent I...